Filter
keyboard_arrow_upPublic preaching: Federal Court finds local council’s decision to refuse to issue a permit to preach in a public mall was beyond power
Corneloup v Launceston City Council [2016] FCA 974 (19 August 2016)The Federal Court of Australia has upheld a challenge to a decision by the Launceston City Council to refuse to grant a permit to preach Christian ideology in a public pedestrian mall on administrative law grounds.
Read moreJudicial misunderstanding of bisexuality leads to dangerous ruling on protection claim for Jamaican man seeking asylum
Ray Fuller v Loretta E Lynch, Attorney General of the United States, 833 F.3d 866 (7th Cir, 2016)The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has refused to review the case of a person seeking asylum, despite the man's fear of persecution should he be returned to Jamaica. Ray Fuller testified that he identified as bisexual and there was evidence he was at risk of harassment and torture.
Read moreItalian court upholds freedom from discrimination on basis of sexual orientation
Roverto Court Order of 21 June 2016 (Sacred Heart Case)This appeal was brought in the Rovereto Court (Court) by a teacher employed by the Institute of the Daughters of the Sacred Heart of Jesus (Institute) in Rovereto, located in Northern Italy.
Read moreScotland’s Named Persons Scheme: balancing children’s welfare against privacy rights
Case of The Christian Institute and others v The Lord Advocate (Scotland) [2016] UKSC 51 (28 July 2016)In a recent judgment, the United Kingdom Supreme Court unanimously blocked the introduction of the Scottish Government's Named Persons scheme (Scheme), due to its incompatibility with article 8 (right to private and family life) of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). The Scheme was part of a package of child welfare measures introduced under the Children and Young People (Scotland) Act 2014 (the Act).
Read moreHigh Court rules on Department of Immigration ‘data breach’ cases
Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZSSJ [2016] HCA 29 (27 July 2016)On 10 February 2014 the Department of Immigration and Border Protection inadvertently published on its website the identifying details of 9,258 applicants for protection visas held in immigration detention (“Data Breach”). The Data Breach carried the risk that authorities in the named detainees’ countries of origin would become aware that they had sought protection in Australia, creating a new and independent risk of harm if those detainees were returned to those countries. The Department conducted International Treaties Obligations Assessments (“ITOAs”) to determine if the Data Breach affected Australia’s non-refoulement obligations with respect to the detainees.
Read moreColombian Constitutional Court invalidates mining policy for violating fundamental rights of Indigenous and Afrocolombian peoples
Sentence T-766 of 2015 (Constitutional Court of Columbia)The Colombian Constitutional Court recently invalidated ‘strategic mining areas’ (SMA) which would have made mining concessions over almost 20% of the country available by tender, because they violated the rights of Indigenous and Afrocolombian peoples to prior consultation.
Read moreECHR confirms that right to freedom of expression breached in taking action against prisoners for making complaints
Case of Shahanov and Palfreeman v Bulgaria (Application nos. 35365/12 and 69125/12) [2016] ECHR 686 (21 July 2016)The applicants, Mr Shahanov and Mr Palfreeman, are currently serving extended prison sentences in Bulgaria's Plovdiv and Sofia Prisons. Both applicants commenced proceedings against the Republic of Bulgaria in the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) in 2012. The ECHR subsequently joined the proceedings due to their similarity.
Read moreECHR finds failure to recognise parents of children born as a result of international commercial surrogacy violates the right to privacy
Case of Foulon and Bouvet v France (Application No’s 9063/14 and 10410/14) (21 July 2016) The European Court of Human Rights (the Court) has delivered a judgment protecting the rights of children born as a result of international commercial surrogacy to have their relationships with their biological parents legally recognised. The Court unanimously found that refusal by French authorities to transcribe the birth certificates of children born under surrogacy agreements in India violated the children's right to respect for private life under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention). The judgment resolves past uncertainty as to whether the Court's earlier decisions on surrogacy would extend to same-sex families.
Read moreTexas voter ID law found to have disparate impact
Veasey v Abbott No. 14-41127, 2016 WL 3923868 (5th Cir. July 20, 2016)A US federal court has handed civil rights groups a crucial win ahead of this year's presidential election after ruling that Texas’ restrictive voting legislation has a discriminatory effect on Hispanic and African American voters. The 2011 law requires voters to produce one of a limited number of forms of identification and is the nation’s strictest voter photo ID law, leaving more than half a million eligible voters unable to fully participate in the democratic process. The recent ruling will require that measures are taken to allow disenfranchised voters to participate in this November’s US presidential election.
Read moreUK Supreme Court rejects Lord Chancellor’s attempt to limit legal aid availability
R (on the application of The Public Law Project) (Appellant) v Lord Chancellor (Respondent) [2016] UKSC 39 In the recent decision of R v Lord Chancellor [2016] UKSC 39, the UK Supreme Court has rejected an attempt by the Lord Chancellor to limit the availability of legal aid on the basis of citizenship and continuous residence in the UK, concluding this was outside the Lord Chancellor's power.
Read moreEuropean Court of Human Rights holds that the immigration detention of LGBTI refugee contravened Article 5(1) of the Convention
Case of O.M. v. Hungary (Application numbers 9912/15) [2016] ECHR (5 July 2016)The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has held that immigration detention of an LGBTI Iranian person seeking asylum in Hungary contravened article 5(1) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (the Convention).
Read moreCanadian law society’s decision to refuse accreditation due to discriminatory policy reasonable
Trinity Western University v The Law Society of Upper Canada [2016] ONCA 518The Court of Appeal for Ontario has upheld a lower court’s decision to dismiss an application for judicial review of the Law Society of Upper Canada’s (LSUC) decision to refuse accreditation to an evangelical Christian law school. The Court reviewed the LSUC’s decision by reference to the standard of reasonableness and held that, in making its decision, the LSUC reasonably balanced the appellants’ rights to religious freedom against its statutory objective of protecting the ‘public interest’.
Read more